Cursor vs Tabnine
A detailed comparison of AI-assisted developer tools.
Growth compared
Let's start by breaking down the key metrics of each tool. You can hover over the chart for more information.
Summary
Both Cursor and Tabnine are in the Code Autocompletion category. Code autocompletion tools save developers time and effort by automatically suggesting and completing code snippets based on the context of the code being written.
Cursor emphasizes Real-time AI assistance, Inline chat, Auto-debugging in its feature set. Tabnine highlights Context-aware suggestions, Deep IDE integration as its core functionalities.
Company profiles
Tool | Cursor | Tabnine |
---|---|---|
💰 Funding | $8 million | $25 million |
💵 Revenue | $7.8 million annually | $5.8 million annually |
👨👩👧👦 Employee Count | 100 | 67 |
🏛️ Founding Year | 2020 | 2013 |
🏠 Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Tel Aviv, Israel |
👋 Hi, I'm Zachary
I'm a Staff Software Engineer and I use AI dev tools every day.